Historic Houses for Sale: 262 Mount Sterling Avenue, Flemingsburg, Fleming County, Kentucky

Between 1902 and 1926, the Radford Architectural Company of Chicago touted itself as the “Largest Architectural Establishment in the World.” For as little as five dollars, prospective homeowners could purchase house blueprints, specifications, and a material list, and then work with a local builder and lumber yard to construct their dream home.

On a shady hillside above Mount Sterling Avenue in Flemingsburg, Kentucky, a Radford-designed house stands, almost identical to the drawing of the house in a 1903 Radford plan book. After being owned by only two families in 108 years, this shingled beauty is looking for a new family

A Radford-designed house in Flemingsburg, Kentucky.

Known as “House Design No. 121,” the plans for this dwelling first appeared in the book The Radford Ideal Homes: 100 Houses in 1903. The company would go on to publish more than 40 catalogs of house plans, technical and instruction manuals (like Radford’s Cement Houses and How to Build Them, published in 1909), and trade journals. But Ideal Homes was the company’s first foray into residential house plans for everyday Americans.

The cover of the 1903 book makes me want to buy a house plan!

The houses in the plan book are mostly frame, one to two story, vernacular dwellings that are neither too plain nor too ostentatious. Design No. 121 features bay windows, a rambling and atypical roof with cross gables and a half-gambrel form with cornice returns, and a combination of weatherboards and shingles. These elements all blend together to create an appealing and approachable family house.

The elevation of the house from the 1903 publication.

Most of the plans could be described by architectural historians like me as “picturesque.” That term might not mean much, but overall, most of the designs are inviting, homey, and seem to promise comfort and solidity. Natural light floods the home, and the hardwood floors gleam much like I expect they did in the years before World War I, when this house was built.

I always appreciate little things like solid wood doors and original hardware.

The plan for what would become the home of T. Hargis MacDonald and his family ran in a column in the Flemingsburg Times-Democrat in 1905. This house was built sometime between 1905 and 1912, as the outer limits of the streets around the commercial core of downtown Flemingsburg began to fill up with new single family homes. This lot was originally part of the parcel surrounding the Spates family home to the north of the MacDonald House.

Facade and side elevation of the MacDonald House.

The homes designed by Radford’s team of architects were described as “original, practical, and attractive house designs, such as 75 to 90% of people today wish to build.” And the plans met a receptive audience, as the United States was just a decade into what would be the largest home building period of so-called suburban homes since declaring its independence from England.

A detail of the Colonial Revival-inspired porch post and columns.

While the plans for this house cost $5.00, the estimated price for its construction was between $1,100 and $1,350. Based on inflation (and this is not the most accurate figure, but I am not an economic historian) that is equivalent to around $39,000.00 today.

The plan for the MacDonald House as it was published in 1903.

MacDonald, a merchant in downtown Flemingsburg, lived in the home with his wife Lettie, and their three children: Lloyd, Marie, and baby T. Hargis, Jr. According to the 1920 census, the family shared the home (which encompasses around 1,600 square feet) with MacDonald’s parents, his sister, Nellie Louderback, her two sons, and two boarders!

A view from the living room (“parlor” on the original plan) into the front hall and dining room.

Although I was amazed by how roomy the house is, with three nice-sized bedrooms on the second story (and each bedroom is blessed with spacious closets, something I wish my 1901 house possessed!), I’m not quite sure how essentially three families lived in the house. Of course, there is a full-basement (with a poured concrete floor) with windows and an exterior entrance, so perhaps that was utilized by some of the residents.

The bedroom at the front of the house.

The MacDonald House does differ from the original Radford plan, with slight variations on both the exterior and the interior. The second story gables were built with paired windows instead of triple windows, and the upper sash does not contain tracery muntins (though it may have when first built).

The original upstairs bathroom, with a historic clawfoot tub and beadboard walls.

Though the plan shows a fireplace, this version was built without one. Perhaps most importantly for modern families: the one bathroom in the original plan (on the second story by the bedrooms, which was very common in the early 20th century) has been joined by another full bathroom and a half-bath on the first floor. There’s also a shower in the basement!

A foundation detail – I love how the rock-faced concrete features narrow bands of brick.

The home stayed in the MacDonald family until 1978, when it was purchased by the current owners. In 1985, the house was listed as a contributing resource in the National Register of Historic Places Flemingsburg Historic District. This designation does not convey any restrictions on the house – but it DOES make it eligible for historic tax credits! A new owner could utilize historic tax credits for any number of projects: painting, new HVAC, a roof replacement, and the like.

Detail of the staircase in the front hall of the house.

This is the first Radford-designed house I’ve documented, and I have to admit I fell a little bit in love with it. It’s been well-loved and is remarkably intact, which pleases my architectural historian soul. But as the owner and occupant of an old house myself, I also appreciate that the MacDonald House has been sensitively updated, and with the right new owner – it will be a lovely dwelling for another 100 years.

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Comments

  1. Susan Dworkin says:

    I wish I could buy it . What a lovely house! Thanks for the tour!

  2. Jim McKeighen says:

    Excellent as always! Thanks again!

  3. Thank you so much! It is a lovely tribute of our family home. You captured its essence very well. My mother would be so pleased you told the story of her home. It seems like an appropriate way to close this chapter.

  4. Beautiful photos Janie – what camera/lens are you using? Three balusters per tread is so much more elegant than two!

    1. Janie-Rice Brother says:

      Thank you! I have an ancient (2012) Nikon 3100 DSLR, with just the standard lens. Sometimes it is temperamental, but I think that is more my fault than the camera’s fault…

  5. Beth Tackett says:

    Thank you for a lovely description of the house I grew up in. I cherish the memories of our family home.

    Beth T.

  6. Mary Jean Kinsman says:

    Great article, Janie. I knew about the Sears houses, but I had not heard of the Radford company.

    Mary Jean

Comments are closed.